Skip to content
Wonder&
Workflow

First-party implementation study

Building our operations assessment as a bounded workflow

This is an internal implementation note, not a client case study. It shows the inputs, design decisions, controls, and tests behind Wonder & Workflow’s own public assessment—without claiming invented savings.

BoundarySeven questions; 0–21 indicative score
Data postureAnswers calculated in the browser
Human roleConsultant interprets context
Claim limitNo automatic diagnosis or savings claim

Starting condition

The business needed a useful first step that did not pretend a short questionnaire could diagnose an operation.

The assessment had to help an owner notice workflow friction, preserve privacy, work on mobile and keyboard, and lead naturally to a human conversation. It could not collect credentials, infer ROI, or activate a customer workflow.

Before and after process map

From a vague request to a reviewable next step

Before
  1. Owner feels operational friction
  2. Problem stays broad
  3. Solution discussion begins too early
After
  1. Owner answers seven bounded questions
  2. Browser calculates an indicative band
  3. Result names discussion areas and limitations
  4. Owner chooses whether to email for a fit review
01

Controls built into the workflow

  • The assessment does not request contact details or confidential records.
  • Answers and result remain in browser memory unless the visitor independently chooses to contact us.
  • Score language is indicative, not diagnostic.
  • The consultation—not the score—determines whether a deeper diagnostic makes sense.
  • Customer communications and CRM automation remain outside this workflow.
02

Acceptance criteria

  • All seven questions are usable by keyboard and at narrow mobile widths.
  • Score boundaries follow the documented 0–21 calculation rules.
  • Refresh and back/forward behavior do not submit information.
  • Privacy, contact, and assessment routes are crawlable public pages; internal workspace routes are excluded.
  • The result states its limits and provides a clear next step.

Observed result

A functioning assessment with explicit boundaries—not a fabricated ROI story.

The implemented flow gives visitors a two-minute self-assessment and keeps their answers local to the browser. Automated build, calculation, route, accessibility, and browser tests are maintained in the project. Test results describe software behavior only; they do not prove client savings or commercial outcomes.

What we would measure next

Evidence should grow with real use.

Useful next measures include completion rate, qualified fit-review requests, the workflows visitors choose to discuss, accessibility issues, and the percentage of reviews that lead to a grounded proceed, revise, or stop decision. Any future case study should state its baseline, method, period, limitations, and permission.

See the workflow

Use the same assessment.

Try the public assessment, then decide whether one workflow deserves a closer look.

Start the assessment